Make Tiger Great Again: Would You Wear It?

So the question of the day is, after Tiger’s tremendous performance at the Masters’ Tournament, would you wear this hat?

beaglescout

Twitter: @beaglescout

"MAGA, m%$@#!^f*&^$%@" --some guy

April 16, 2019

beaglescout

Patriot Dispatches

No Comments

Please Login to comment

Hot Takes

beaglescout / 6 days ago

The US needs to bring back the Ellis Island concept to regulate immigration along the Mexican border. We realize that more desire to enter the US than the US can accept. Some will always be rejected, such as criminals, psychopaths, terrorists, lazy bums looking for a handout, and carriers of dangerous diseases and parasites. Some will usually be rejected, such as those with no work history. And some should be admitted to the US. But the process needs to be made more fair, expeditious, decisive, and clear. Creating such centers in San Diego, Nogales, El Paso, Laredo, and Brownsville would be a great start. What say you?
Read More

vassarbushmills / 2 weeks ago

WORK My dad once said that “Work is like a hat you put on your head. Even if you don’t have any pants you don’t have to walk down the street ashamed of your ass… …If you have a hat.”
Read More

vassarbushmills / 2 months ago

(From a book written in 1947) describing children of privilege when there were far fewer of them; a description of French children of plantation owners around 1800 in the Caribbean: There isn’t one who hasn’t the temper of the devil, the vanity of a peacock, the domineering instincts of a bully and a coward. They’re little despots, little vile-tempered, foul-mouthed tyrants, thinking only of material goods and display, caring nothing for things of the intellect, nothing for the improvement of their minds, nothing for religion.” Anyone who reads this immediately draws an association with American youth of today. But then on deeper reflection, the children of privilege and great wealth come to mind, and that lineage goes as far back as the titular ownership of land, to the ancient Greeks at least. Even Greek ideals of government and law were based on this hereditary ownership of land. These children have always been with us.
Read More

vassarbushmills / 3 months ago

The Rifle as Phallic Symbol You may be too young to remember, but in the 60s certain cars were considered phallic symbols, for men short on other attributes. They produced 1000’s of gag lines in film. These semi-auto rifles that look like he-man weapons came from the same wannabe he-men of the 90s. And those he-men generally arose from the video game culture beginning in the 90s and generally agreed to have been a major cause of the Columbine shooting in ’97.
Read More

vassarbushmills / 3 months ago

Fixing the System to Fix the Problem The Left believes that the more people they cause to be killed with guns will grow their argument that only their government should have guns legally. So look for there to be more shootings until they can grab that power. The one thing they aren’t short of are those lab rats they produce to pull the triggers. You see, almost every mass shooting for the past 25 years had been carried out by people who should have been in the system, and on paper, that “system” has already professed to have the authority and ability to deal with them, for fifty years. Not. Only people with common sense will know where to turn first. And how.
Read More

vassarbushmills / 5 months ago

Just a Reminder this 4th of July Even in the darkest days of Jim Crow, the vast majority of black Americans loved America. Still do.
Read More

vassarbushmills / 6 months ago

I was recently told that before the Civil War Americans spoke of the United States in the plural, “the United States are”, then after the Civil War, it became mentioned in the singular, “the United States is…” I was also told that what changed was Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. Give that some thought.
Read More

beaglescout / 6 months ago

David French expects there to be some sort of mutual tolerance, and that it would be real tolerance. But the left adheres to the Marcusean redefinition of tolerance, as a one-way process that accepts every moral judgment or act that comes from a leftist and rudely, violently rejects every moral judgment or act from anyone not of the left. Their tolerance is not tolerance. Without people using the same words with the same definitions, there can never be comity. That’s the point of the story of the Tower of Babel! Harsh words that offend David French and other anti-Trumpers must be spoken. Legal means must be exercised. Politics must lead to winning, and winning must lead to making changes through legislation and policy, even against grand guignol level protests. It’s going to be nasty. It’s going to be unpleasant. But traditionalists did not choose this “war.” It was thrust on us. And we must not give up the civilization that made the greatest strides in the history of humankind towards establishing harmony and peace among humans.
Read More

Make Tiger Great Again: Would You Wear It?

Like this:

Related

Leave a Reply

Help Keep Unified Patriots Going

User Log In

Drudge

Breitbart

Heritage

Make Tiger Great Again: Would You Wear It?

Share this:

Like this:

Related

Leave a Reply

Help Keep Unified Patriots Going

User Log In

Drudge

Breitbart

Heritage