Sunday, September 26, 2021
HomePatriot DispatchesGetting Inside Mitt's Head to See His VP Choice

Getting Inside Mitt’s Head to See His VP Choice

I’m not Spock, so I can’t do a mind meld to discover what Mitt Romney is thinking. All I can do is offer some political analysis. This is an important decision, but let’s not be too melodramatic about it. 2012 is NOT 2008, and removing Obama from office is exciting the base no matter the VP candidate. A really terrible pick could depress the base, but Mitt won’t go there. In 2008, John McCain achieved his goal of winning the Republican nomination. In 2012, Mitt Romney’s goal is to be elected President. Some are going to moan and groan after the decision is announced, and like Rush recently said to a caller I don’t know what to say to a whiner.

Below is a list of the criteria for VP that Mitt has in mind:

  • 1) Pro life: Romney’s selection will almost certainly have to tick this box. Pro life tends to be a requirement for winning the Republican nomination, but given Romney’s questionable conservative history on social issues, it is probably especially important to him.
  • 2) Governor: One of the best things that Romney has going for him is that he hasn’t been in Washington the past few years. Picking someone else from outside the Beltway would be a plus for him. Moreover, “competent executive” is one of Romney’s campaign themes; picking another executive reinforces this argument.
  • 3) Adequate experience: Call this the “Palin issue.” Romney will want someone who is ready for prime time, and who has served at least a full term in office, preferably as Governor or US Senator.
  • 4) “First do no harm”: To be sure, every vice presidential pick opens up new lines of attack, as no politician is without his or her warts. At the same time, some attacks hurt more than others, some politicians would overshadow Romney, and some politicians are particularly gaffe-prone.
  • 5) Loyalty: All politicians appreciate this trait and want to reward it. This isn’t a year like 1980 for the Republicans or 1960 for the Democrats, where there are obvious benefits to selecting an opponent from a different wing of the party in order to promote party unity or to seek regional advantage. Romney will prefer someone who has been a “Romney guy” since before the Iowa caucus.
  • 6) Not scary: Romney has to avoid choosing a running mate whose social conservatism would become a lightning rod, and tend to dominate the debate.

The pro life position is the one that Mitt needs in order not to depress his base. Except for the Governor category, the other considerations in the mind of Mitt only make it more likely his VP choice will be bland and boring instead of a rock-ribbed constitutional conservative. Even so, whoever the VP candidate is no reason to stay home this election. Obama has got to go, and voting for Romney is the only sane option.

Below is a list of the names I believe are swirling around in Mitt’s head. Please understand that this list of names are not my recommendations, but my guess of possible names Mitt is considering:

  • Bobby Jindal
  • Tim Pawlenty
  • John Thune
  • Rob Portman
  • Kelly Ayotte

Forty days from now we all will know who Mitt has selected for VP. Senate Minority Leader McConnell and political strategist Karl Rove have talked up Marco Rubio, and large donors have suggested Paul Ryan. I like Rubio and Ryan, but I don’t think they make the cut to the short list for the following reasons:

Marco Rubio: The additional revelation that Rubio was baptized as a Mormon and he’s now a Catholic could bring unwelcome attention to Romney’s Mormon faith.

Paul Ryan: Ryan’s budget plan has become a lightning rod, and it will be a focus of Democratic attacks in the fall and overshadow Romney.

Now I could be all wet in my guesswork. Discussion about what Mitt is thinking is welcome, and I can be persuaded that I have misread Mitt’s mind.

pilgrim
I am retired after 36 years of being a state of Indiana employee. I enjoy writing and reading conservative blogs.

8 COMMENTS

Leave a Reply

8 COMMENTS

  1. I’m afraid Conservatives are falling down on this point Pilgrim.

    I believe we will ultimately loose on this one if we don’t wise up.

    I’m convinced, whoever Romney picks will be the next GOP nominee in 16 or 20 unless Romney picks a dufus like Quail. We need to get loud that we won’t stand for another Moderate McCain/GHW Bush/Ford/Nixon next in line type succession that ends up setting us back another 8 to 12 years while we wait for a chance to win with a real conservative at the top of the ticket.

    • Conservatives that fall down need to get back up.  Instead of getting loud about what what we won’t stand for we need to win more elections so that we are the establishment. The establishment that participate in votes and decisions we don’t like are not going to be influenced by how loud we are.  Instead of trying to influence them we need to be in larger numbers to vote them out of power.

      • That said, I have to agree with Pilgrim on this point.  I do not think the VP candidate in 2012 (whether Romney wins 0,1, or 2 terms in office) accrues to him/herself a huge advantage in the next nomination fight.  Particularly if the person is somebody not from the conservative wing.

        The Tea Party movement appears to have had little effect on the presidential primary this season, much to the chagrin of the faithful.  However, that is ONLY the appearance. It is a bottom-up movement, with huge resistance from the top down.  The movement is live and vibrant, and grows in direct proportion to the amount of governmental oppression and financial irresponsibility.  It will take over the party and drive those poltroons from power, it just takes time.

        If the Mittster picks some flatulent party moderate blowhard as his VP, like for example Chris Christie or John Cornyn, that person will be rejected out of hand in the next nomination. The people are in the mood to move rightward, and I dare say 4-8 years of Romney would reinforce that mood.

        If on the other hand, he picks a reliable and charismatic conservative, that person might benefit.  But then again, I don’t think either of us finds that terribly objectionable.

        •  Agreed….but I don’t think we should be quiet in the face of a Romney move to appoint a squish successor either….I’m fond of saying “Your silence is your consent”….sad to say, I’ve fallen silent for a while now…but that’s about to change….

  1. I’m afraid Conservatives are falling down on this point Pilgrim.

    I believe we will ultimately loose on this one if we don’t wise up.

    I’m convinced, whoever Romney picks will be the next GOP nominee in 16 or 20 unless Romney picks a dufus like Quail. We need to get loud that we won’t stand for another Moderate McCain/GHW Bush/Ford/Nixon next in line type succession that ends up setting us back another 8 to 12 years while we wait for a chance to win with a real conservative at the top of the ticket.

    • Conservatives that fall down need to get back up.  Instead of getting loud about what what we won’t stand for we need to win more elections so that we are the establishment. The establishment that participate in votes and decisions we don’t like are not going to be influenced by how loud we are.  Instead of trying to influence them we need to be in larger numbers to vote them out of power.

      • That said, I have to agree with Pilgrim on this point.  I do not think the VP candidate in 2012 (whether Romney wins 0,1, or 2 terms in office) accrues to him/herself a huge advantage in the next nomination fight.  Particularly if the person is somebody not from the conservative wing.

        The Tea Party movement appears to have had little effect on the presidential primary this season, much to the chagrin of the faithful.  However, that is ONLY the appearance. It is a bottom-up movement, with huge resistance from the top down.  The movement is live and vibrant, and grows in direct proportion to the amount of governmental oppression and financial irresponsibility.  It will take over the party and drive those poltroons from power, it just takes time.

        If the Mittster picks some flatulent party moderate blowhard as his VP, like for example Chris Christie or John Cornyn, that person will be rejected out of hand in the next nomination. The people are in the mood to move rightward, and I dare say 4-8 years of Romney would reinforce that mood.

        If on the other hand, he picks a reliable and charismatic conservative, that person might benefit.  But then again, I don’t think either of us finds that terribly objectionable.

        •  Agreed….but I don’t think we should be quiet in the face of a Romney move to appoint a squish successor either….I’m fond of saying “Your silence is your consent”….sad to say, I’ve fallen silent for a while now…but that’s about to change….

Must Read