Would a new City of Brookhaven (Ga.) welcome a new City of Mike?

2
348

Where does this New City movement stop? With a new City of Mike, when every person is their own munici-personality divorced from DeKalb County?

No taxation without representation

Such was the battle cry of colonists resentful of a distant and arbitrary King and Parliament unresponsive to their happiness pursuits. The shot heard round the world at Lexington and Concord launched an American revolution in self government largely defined by state and local control of most affairs with a federal government limited to defense, foreign affairs, and regulation of a national currency and interstate commerce. The 20th Century has seen an explosion of federal power concentrated in Washington, D.C., but We the People still rightly crave a more responsive government closer to home.

In Georgia

Before the massive growth of the national government, Georgia enshrined responsive local government by carving up the Peach State into 159 counties with none being so large geographically that a citizen couldn’t travel to the county seat and back in one day in the sunshine, with the median size being Murray County at 346.9 square miles. DeKalb County, at 270.9 sq.mi. ranks 113th in size. Georgia has no county larger than 906 sq. mi. By contrast, nine of neighboring South Carolina’s 46 counties are more than 1000 square miles.

Clearly, Georgia has a head start when it comes to responsive local government before one even considers adding a municipal layer of government on top of its compact county governments. Of course, cities naturally developed over time, here in DeKalb, as elsewhere, but the geographic fact of a relatively small county remains. The population has exploded in Metro Atlanta and the needs of certain sections of the the county have fluctuated over time. At times in the past, South DeKalb has been a net taxpayer supporting North DeKalb.

Of late, the opposite is true, but no matter how the Dunwoodys and Sandy Springs of the world try, they can’t wall off an even smaller geographic area within DeKalb and escape the facts on the ground in the county outside their municipalities. Even if you produced another Garden of Eden government with new city boundaries, one will be traveling for work, business and play into that scary non-new city world that less of their tax money supports.

A conservative case against the New City Movement

Enter, the new City of Brookhaven Movement that lately conceded that the tax trade-offs may be only “a wash”. But not to worry, the “quality” of police and fire services will make it all worthwhile? Missing is any persuasive evidence that police and fire response times are inadequate. What is clear is that conservatives, of which this writer is one, have not made the case for their own election to direct county government and that some self-described conservatives desire to add a layer of government in a county already suffering a dearth of unincorporated areas ripe for economic development.

Is it conservative to desire smaller government very close to home? Yes, but at what point does the slicing up of a population become more about walling oneself off from ones inevitably interdependent  neighbors, rather than more efficient and responsive government? I think DeKalb County long ago reached that point. If you want to escape Metro Atlanta’s problems, you will not do so unless you move away from Metro Atlanta. Do Brookhaven Yesites think their quality of life is going to get better with a wash on taxes that may improve sidewalks marginally, while the rest of the county they travel through has less to do more?

And if Brookhaven Yes carries the day later this month, will the new Powers that Be in a City of Brookhaven be receptive to new cites being formed in their midst? If not, why not? Does any principle of conservative self government obtain, or will a new city merely be a plaything for those elected and hired with taxpayer money?

DeKalb County needs all of its citizens to support the county and work to improve the quality of life for all. Diving up an already small area is not the answer. Holding DeKalb County’s elected officials accountable in contested elections is the answer in our conservative opinion.

[Originally published in the Times News (Atlanta, Georgia)]

Mike DeVine

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Atlanta Law & Politics columnist –  Examiner.com

Editor of  Hillbilly Politics and Co-Founder and Editor of Political Daily

Charlotte Observer and Atlanta Journal-Constitution op-eds archived at Townhall.com.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Mike gamecock DeVine
A trial lawyer for two decades in South Carolina; owner of Ati Vista LLC since 2002 now associated with Lupa Law Firm; VP & Counsel for Buddy Allen Roofing & Construction Inc. since 2016 in Atlanta, Georgia; and a freelance writer, DeVine was the conservative voice of the Charlotte Observer from 2006-8 and has been the owner of HillbillyPolitics.com since 2009.
www.devinelawvista.com
Previous articleWhy Tax Increases Never Meet Estimated Revenues
Next articleBy an Angel’s Kiss, SSG Carl E Hammer, 24
A trial lawyer for two decades in South Carolina; owner of Ati Vista LLC since 2002 now associated with Lupa Law Firm; VP & Counsel for Buddy Allen Roofing & Construction Inc. since 2016 in Atlanta, Georgia; and a freelance writer, DeVine was the conservative voice of the Charlotte Observer from 2006-8 and has been the owner of HillbillyPolitics.com since 2009. www.devinelawvista.com

Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
bobmontgomery
July 17, 2012 12:40 pm

In Indiana, the push is on for Local Government Reform as well, but in the opposite direction, with all power and control of the purse centralized, small local schools consolidated, and volunteer fire departments sucked up by bigger authorities more likely to be targeted by the unionistas.
Conservatives seem to be conflicted on the issues, but the progressives will get behind either approach if it means more government, whether its more layers or remote, unaccountable, professional bureaucracies. 
Either way, the considerations involved are common all over the US.  Thanks, Mike, for another foray into the realm of ideas.

LadyImpactOhio
July 17, 2012 6:14 pm

GC we had a “town” west of Columbus that was dissolved. New Rome. They had only 60 residents and it was a speed trap, except all the $$ collected went into the cops’ or town officials pockets. So in 2003 a law was passed allowing the state to shut down towns under 150 if they have fiscal, corruption or election issues. So the state shut it down. It was pretty funny. Some of the residents even had a funeral and carried a coffin.

https://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/January-February-2005/scene_gagnon_janfeb05.msp