Wednesday, September 22, 2021
HomePatriot DispatchesNRO and Sheriff Joe

NRO and Sheriff Joe

Well, National Review Online editors, the whole Sheriff Joe and the birthers thing was so silly you had to expend a whole editorial on it, huh?  Yup, anybody who’s ever even passed through Maricopa County is now on your list and in your sights, because, according to the last few lines of your editorial, even if you oppose higher taxes, you are a  nutcase if you ever shook Joe Arpaio’s hand.

Republicans who have chosen to associate with the birthers have done their party and their country a disservice. And as Sheriff Arpaio settles comfortably into that political mental ward, the same must be said of those Republicans who choose to associate themselves with him more broadly. Those who cannot distinguish between the birthers’ flim-flam and the critical questions that face our nation in 2012 will not win and do not deserve to.

Just what does that mean, NRO? Those who associate with the sheriff “more broadly” are the same as those who associate with him on the birther thing? Are you implying that those on Joe’s side in upholding the laws of Arizona and the United States against illegal immigration are the same as ‘birther supporters’? And if you are opposed to coddling prisoners, ala the sheriff’s pink underwear and tent city schemes, you need to either offer up an apology or have your sponsors boycotted? Are you being spoon fed these lines from Media Matters, NRO? Because it sure sounds a lot like what comes out of the Orgasming for Obama campaign, and the office of the Attorney General of the United States. What’s next, those who appreciate the sheriff’s many years of public service at the federal and local levels are raaaaaacist?

Now as to your last sentence. Exactly who is it that cannot distinguish between the birthers’ flim-flam and the ‘critical questions that face our nation in 2012’? And further, what special powers do you have to see into their minds or psyches as to whether they can or cannot compartmentalize various and sundry issues?

Your haste to calumnize Sherriff Joe causes you to shoot off the mouth from the hip, NRO, and to make nonsensical generalizations. But let’s stay focused on Joe for a moment as you envision him settling into a mental ward. First, is it or is it not a fact that not only has the State of Arizona been sued by the Department of Justice, but also local law enforcement, specifically Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s office, is being quite publicly investigated by Eric Holder’s henchmen? Have you ever been the subject of a bogus investigation meant to destroy you? Go on about Sheriff Joe, NRO; he is obviously THE menace to society, isn’t he?

Secondly, as you sit in your East Coast ivory towers and pontificate, in all your blathering today in which you failed to mention the harassment of Sheriff Joe, how many Fast and Furious guns are still out there floating around Maricopa and surrounding border counties and what kind of insane minds put them there and just how effective have you East Coast pundits been at getting to the root of that problem?   And you’re worried about  a little dog-and-pony show Arpaio is putting on out there?  Talk about ‘critical questions that face our nation’.   By the way,  do you know anything about psychological warfare?  Never mind. But we suspect Brian Terry’s mother  would be in favor of Maricopa County sending a posse to Washington, DC with a rope if that’s what it took.     Sheriff Joe is just a birther nut, isn’t he?

Now, as to the whole birther question and nut cases and you dignified “sane” people in elite media and academia versus the rabble,  just one quick question and then we’ll move on – If the document in question was so prominent, valid, and readily available as you say, why did the Governor of Hawaii spend a good part of his time and energy while in office trying to find it, indeed almost having a nervous breakdown when first vowing to produce it and then being frustrated and remorseful at not being able to?  That’s enough. 

Another question: Did you or did you not, NRO, pimp the works of Stanley Kurtz and Dinesh D’Souza? Hmmmm?
To recap for our readers, Stanley Kurtz called Obama a socialist.  A socialist! Can you imagine anything more radical, off-the-wall and insane as calling the President of the United States a socialist?. What was Kurtz smoking when he wrote that?  There are, to quote you, “critical questions facing our nation” and you want to associate yourselves with someone who engages in that buffoonery? Calling the President insulting names ranks right up there with questioning his legal standing to serve in the office, would you not say? And if that wasn’t bad enough, you have D’Souza, pretending to be a psychologist or psychiatrist and coming up with some cockamamie theory about Obama being obsessed by the ghost of his father and the ghost of British colonialism. How whacked out can you get?  But D’Souza’s your guy – got all that Ivy League cred and publishing house backing, so let’s float some theories around Buckley’s old barn, huh?  For the record, NRO, the Kurtz and D’Souza proposals are probably spot on, but that’s not the point here.

 

Here’s the bottom line, dear and sainted NRO.  In your zeal to portray Arpaio as cuckoo and to disabuse the voting public of in any way entertaining thoughts of supporting or voting for people who have engaged in any endeavor or discussion or  political initiative with Arpaio, and to say they are by association distracted from the real and critical issues, we assume you are vetting those people for us.  Our question to you is, if you had used your influence to force your bretheren and sisteren in the Ivory Towers adjacent to yours  to vet the candidate Barack Hussein Obama, or failing that, if you had done it yourself, would not this whole question of Joe Arpaio and the birthers today be moot?

bobmontgomery
Poor. No advanced degrees. Unorganized. Feeble. Disjointed. Random. Past it. .... Intrigued, Interested, Patriotic and Lucky.

5 COMMENTS

Leave a Reply

5 COMMENTS

  1. Republicans who have chosen to associate with the birthers have done their party and their country a disservice.

    Let’s rephrase that:

    Republicans who have chosen to allow the assault of Obama’s policies have done their party and their country a disservice.

    I put the NRO into that category because they support people who have chosen the above.

    If they want to be that judgmental about anyone or anything, so shall they be judged.

    Who is the worst offender here? An inconsequential birther movement or a so-called conservative media outlet?

  2. Sheriff Joe has been right to pursue this, but alas, the wrong documents. Obama’s passport would be one more of interest. A lot doesn’t gibe, including the phony SSN. I have no doubt that Obama, as a kid had other passports, possibly into college.

  3. As the presidential campaign slogs on and operatives and commenters deperately try to quash any notion of a “brokered” convention, NRO makes it clear that anyone ever associated with Arpaio is immediately suspect. We recall that Arpaio supported Perry for prez back in the day, and that Perry defended the sheriff against onslaughts from the grievance mongers and from the Justice Department. Meanwhile, the left, having pulled back from it’s vicious “Pummel Palin” crusade for a while, also senses the mood of constitutional conservatives is not settled and has resumed trying to pour water on any remaining embers of affection for her.
    That the establishment Left and the Establishment right both seem sensitive to the necessity of nipping in the bud any grass roots groundswells for alternatives should factor into anybody’s decision-making process. In the end, it might not be possible to upset the applecart, but apparently some in high places are worried about it.

  1. Republicans who have chosen to associate with the birthers have done their party and their country a disservice.

    Let’s rephrase that:

    Republicans who have chosen to allow the assault of Obama’s policies have done their party and their country a disservice.

    I put the NRO into that category because they support people who have chosen the above.

    If they want to be that judgmental about anyone or anything, so shall they be judged.

    Who is the worst offender here? An inconsequential birther movement or a so-called conservative media outlet?

  2. Sheriff Joe has been right to pursue this, but alas, the wrong documents. Obama’s passport would be one more of interest. A lot doesn’t gibe, including the phony SSN. I have no doubt that Obama, as a kid had other passports, possibly into college.

  3. As the presidential campaign slogs on and operatives and commenters deperately try to quash any notion of a “brokered” convention, NRO makes it clear that anyone ever associated with Arpaio is immediately suspect. We recall that Arpaio supported Perry for prez back in the day, and that Perry defended the sheriff against onslaughts from the grievance mongers and from the Justice Department. Meanwhile, the left, having pulled back from it’s vicious “Pummel Palin” crusade for a while, also senses the mood of constitutional conservatives is not settled and has resumed trying to pour water on any remaining embers of affection for her.
    That the establishment Left and the Establishment right both seem sensitive to the necessity of nipping in the bud any grass roots groundswells for alternatives should factor into anybody’s decision-making process. In the end, it might not be possible to upset the applecart, but apparently some in high places are worried about it.

Must Read