California Redistricting Transparency Hits Brick Wall. Hard.


Yesterday, the California Citizens Redistricting Commission (CCRC) published its first maps for public comment on the redistricting process.   Below, you see the map published for what may become the “new” AD49 inb CA.  Alas, the redistricting process is rapidly losing the transparency that many hoped would govern the  commission characterized as a citizen’s redistricting commission.


The CCRC got off to a good start with many public hearings across the state, held by a commission composed of non-aligned citizens as oppopsed to legislators and their aides.

Now that the first round of proposed maps have been published, transparency has hit a brick wall.

Few to none of the many, many stakeholders involved, from political parties, to civic organizations, to industrial and lobbying groups, are able to evaluate the new maps in detail due to technology choices that the CCRC has made.  While most causual observers will find the .PDF maps the CCRC has published adequate to satisfy transient curiousity, many who need to take a closer look will not find them satisfactory at all.

It’s as if the CCRC had chosen to publish the proposed maps on the Kindle, but not on paper, requiring an expensive device to view the full work of the commission.  It’s the difference between knowing a proposed budget total, and being able to see the line items in the budget.

In order to get a detailed look at proposed new district boundaries, and compare the new boundaries with existing boundaries and civic/county boundaries, the curious stakeholder must either invest in expensive mapping software, or by appointment, book time on a university computer.  Neither should be a requirement to get a close look at the proposed maps.  Many civic groups do not have the budget to purchase the required software, and it’s entirely predictable that requests for time on university computers to examine the proposed maps will rapidly outstrip appointments that the universities and other agencies can supply.

The conversation gets arcane from this point, but the problem lies in the proprietary format that the CCRC chose to publish its detailed mapping data.  That data can only be read by expensive mapping programs such as Maptitude or ArcGIS (with expensive add-ons required).

In order to keep the redistricting process fully transparent and give ordinary citizens full access to the boundary decisions they are making in our names, the CCRC should publish links to freeware programs that can be used to load and observe the mapping changes that they propose and/or they should provide their data in a format (.KML files) that can be loaded into the first mapping solution most consumers think of: Google Maps or Google Earth.


0 0 vote
Article Rating
Previous articleSpot Report: rVotes Heads for Ohio
Next articleRightOnline This Week – Two Firsts: rVotes and PC Strategy Break-out
Ron Robinson (Alhambra, CA) is founder of, a national internet platform that broke the party Voter Vault/PDI monopoly and delivered precinct walk lists in the 2010 election for over 16 million voters in wards in 20 US states. added Precinct Committeeman (PC) Strategy support in Dec of 2010 and is rapidly emerging as a premier online Precinct Strategy resource having worked directly with party and election officials in states to remove local obstacles to becoming a Precinct Committeeman. He is GOP Chair for the AD49 GOP Central Committee, a member of the Los Angeles County GOP Central Committee and a member of the LA GOP Technology Committee. Robinson worked as New Media Director for the John Colbert campaign for US Congress. He is an expert in social media and internet security and an outspoken advocate of precinct committee work, GOTV work, and transparency in party governance.
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 11, 2011 10:06 pm

The few Conservatives here in California have tried to stay on top of this process. It’s truly unfortunate that the controlling persons in the commission have made this final attempt to obscure the results.

Anybody wanting a running dialog about this batlle can go to and see what we’ve been up against.

Queen Hotchibobo
June 13, 2011 2:19 pm

Call me skeptical, but just looking at that one district makes it abundantly clear that CA is still getting gerrymandered to death. Will we ever get to the point where voters choose their politicians rather than politicians choosing their voters?

June 13, 2011 3:18 pm

Pilgrim has convinced me, 435 is NOT ENOUGH! We need to unfreeze the numbers and stop this slanted towards the incumbent redistricting process. Its a win-win for us, with thousands of Representatives in the US House they would get little done (WIN!) and what they did would truly represent what the citizens wanted.