Tuesday, September 28, 2021
HomePatriot DispatchesU.K. Speech Police Target Melanie Phillips.

U.K. Speech Police Target Melanie Phillips.

But don’t worry…… ‘It can’t happen here’.

Not in a million administrations.

Sunstein’s F.C.C. – Net Neutrality – Fairness Doctrine……

Oh…… Wait……

The implications of this are staggering to say the least.

PCC Investigates Melanie Phillips’ Spectator Blog.

A Melanie Phillips blogpost on the Spectator website which referred to the “moral depravity” of Arab “savages” is being investigated by the Press Complaints Commission.

Well…… What would YOU call a Muslim or group of Muslims who murdered five members of a Jewish family – both parents and three very young children – by stabbing them multiple times each, including slitting the throat of a three-month-old ?

I know what I’d call them – and have done so numerous times – So has The Israeli Government.

I’d call them ‘peace lovers’…… I’d call them ‘believers in Islam’…… I’d call them ‘murdering bas***ds who have voided any rights to continue breathing the air of a free people’…… I’d call them……

Ms. Phillips was talking about the murderers, PLUS people in the streets of Gaza celebrating murder by handing out candy to children (they did it in 2010 too) and singing praises that Jews were ‘dealt with’ according to the laws of Islam.

Ms. Phillips also called out the media in a big way.  It’s a sure bet this is where an overwhelming majority of the ‘complaints’ were generated.

Here are the first two paragraphs of Ms. Phillips column:

Today the massacred Fogel family was buried in Jerusalem. And as anticipated, the moral depravity of the Arabs is finding a grotesque echo in the moral bankruptcy and worse of the British and American ‘liberal’ media – a sickening form of armchair barbarism which is also in evidence, it has to be said, on the comment thread beneath my post below.

Overwhelmingly, the media have either ignored or downplayed the atrocity – or worse, effectively blamed the victims for bringing it on themselves, describing them as ‘hard-line settlers’ or extremists. Given that three of the victims were children, one a baby of three months whose throat was cut, such a response is utterly degraded.

Regarding The U.K. Press Complaints Commission, this is a far-left-driven, uber-politically correct official government entity that drops anvils on the heads of anyone crossing their constantly changing line, almost always when it’s involving patriotic U.K. citizens and journalists speaking truth to a power.  They don’t want to hear it and have simply enacted mandates to prove their authoritarian position.

At minimum, this news about the government treating Ms. Phillips as a felonious criminal suspect should set off nothing less than a fully peaceful but massive civil bombardment of “who the he** do you think you are” directed at The U.K. Government.

But then again, The United Kingdom is so far gone towards Dhimmitude and submission to Islam, that depending on width and breath of coverage and resulting adjudication of this one ‘investigation’, there’s the very large and very real probability of permanent and legally-enforced silencing of all criticism and dissent emanating from patriotic U.K. citizens and others.   There are on-the-books penalties of  fines and/or actual prison sentences stemming from these ‘complaints’ for simply voicing opinions, even when backed up by multiple facts and actualities.

A few links to articles offered so you can see the depth of evil infiltrated into some of the highest levels of U.K. governance — CNNU.K. Guardian — Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch (with multiple sources) and an aggregate site called The Global Muslim Brotherhood Report.

Please read it all – including all links at the respective pages – and arrive at your own conclusions.

— — — — —

Kenny Solomon
Israel Survival Updates & T.A.S.G.

Cross-posted at Israel Survival Updates and at The American Survival Guide.

Follow Israel Survival Updates On Twitter.

Kenny Solomonhttp://israelsurvivalupdates.com
I'm a typical bitter Eeeeevil Joooooooooooish God-clingin' flag-wavin' NASCAR-lovin', NRA-Certified Firearms Instructor, Oath Keeper and Patriot Guard Rider in South Florida ------ Tally-Ho Snackbar !™ and Reaganhu Akhbar !

2 COMMENTS

Leave a Reply

2 COMMENTS

  1. For those who think, as Kenny likes to say “It can’t happen…here?” Think again. There are in certain jurisdictions in the US certain laws establishing what are called “hate crimes”. These are usually defined as acts of violence or intimidation against people based on the hatred of the perpetrator(s) for the victim(s). Now, avoiding the Orwellian ‘Thought crime’ scenario, how does the prosecution prove “hate”? They prove it ,by statements made during the commission of the crime, or beforehand, which indicate hate. Well, you might say that could be a pretty subjective thing, and you would be right, but we all ‘just know’ what constitutes ‘hate speech’ don’t we? Why sure. So that, even though your liberal bretheren will tell you that hate *speech* is protected by the First Amendment, such *speech* can and will be used as evidence against an accused perp when someone claims injury and thus the application of the hate crimes statutes. Further, even if you are not the perp, but you have made certain ….statements …(Arab savages) …and you are an associate, or aquaintance or have some provable relationship to or influence on the perp, you could be charged as an accessory to a hate crime.
    So that, the freedom of speech in the United States is a myth. Speech is necessarily constrained by the fear that it could be used either in or out of context in a court of law.
    Hate crime laws are unconstitutional because the “hate” cannot be proven, except by the stretch of pointing to speech. We have laws against murder in this country which necessitate the death penalty, and which do not require proving motive. Reason? It is impossible to prove motive. If I slug you while screaming at the top of my lungs that I hate you, I might be lying. On the other hand, if I steal your money and tell police it was because you are an Arab savage, I might also be lying. I just wanted your money.
    Thanks for your reporting, Kenny.

  2. Yep, this is all up for debate. Twitter tells me and others, because of free speech, they don’t moderate or take down comments that may be what I construe as “hate speech” or personal attacks that can or may be harmful to others.

    After Giffords and others were shot, there were a ton of awful, vile tweets from the libs advocating killing #tcots and others, including Sarah Palin. Twitter refused to ban the tweeps, under the mantra of “free speech.”

    Free speech and speech that can harm others are two different things. Phillips doesn’t fall under that category.

    Cross the UK off the list as one of those countries I will NOT be visiting. I’ll spend my hard earned dollars elsewhere, thank you very much.

    Thank you Kenny for bringing this to our attention.

  1. For those who think, as Kenny likes to say “It can’t happen…here?” Think again. There are in certain jurisdictions in the US certain laws establishing what are called “hate crimes”. These are usually defined as acts of violence or intimidation against people based on the hatred of the perpetrator(s) for the victim(s). Now, avoiding the Orwellian ‘Thought crime’ scenario, how does the prosecution prove “hate”? They prove it ,by statements made during the commission of the crime, or beforehand, which indicate hate. Well, you might say that could be a pretty subjective thing, and you would be right, but we all ‘just know’ what constitutes ‘hate speech’ don’t we? Why sure. So that, even though your liberal bretheren will tell you that hate *speech* is protected by the First Amendment, such *speech* can and will be used as evidence against an accused perp when someone claims injury and thus the application of the hate crimes statutes. Further, even if you are not the perp, but you have made certain ….statements …(Arab savages) …and you are an associate, or aquaintance or have some provable relationship to or influence on the perp, you could be charged as an accessory to a hate crime.
    So that, the freedom of speech in the United States is a myth. Speech is necessarily constrained by the fear that it could be used either in or out of context in a court of law.
    Hate crime laws are unconstitutional because the “hate” cannot be proven, except by the stretch of pointing to speech. We have laws against murder in this country which necessitate the death penalty, and which do not require proving motive. Reason? It is impossible to prove motive. If I slug you while screaming at the top of my lungs that I hate you, I might be lying. On the other hand, if I steal your money and tell police it was because you are an Arab savage, I might also be lying. I just wanted your money.
    Thanks for your reporting, Kenny.

  2. Yep, this is all up for debate. Twitter tells me and others, because of free speech, they don’t moderate or take down comments that may be what I construe as “hate speech” or personal attacks that can or may be harmful to others.

    After Giffords and others were shot, there were a ton of awful, vile tweets from the libs advocating killing #tcots and others, including Sarah Palin. Twitter refused to ban the tweeps, under the mantra of “free speech.”

    Free speech and speech that can harm others are two different things. Phillips doesn’t fall under that category.

    Cross the UK off the list as one of those countries I will NOT be visiting. I’ll spend my hard earned dollars elsewhere, thank you very much.

    Thank you Kenny for bringing this to our attention.

Must Read