#winning the internet…this is how it’s done.
h/t Brian Faughnan
For. The. WIN. open thread
14 COMMENTS
-
Or, maybe…you’re looking for me
-
You guys will like this one. Or at least I did.
-
endurance challenge…how long can you last?
-
43 seconds
-
Couldn’t get passed the title, so Zero.
-
Me too. I’ve had enough Charlie Sheen for a lifetime.
-
-
-
via @StevenFoley
I was eating lunch today with my 12 year old grandson when his mom asked him “What is tomorrow?”
He said “It’s President’s Day”
She asked “What does that mean?” …. I was waiting for something profound…
He said, “President’s Day is when Obama steps out of the White House and if he sees his shadow, we have 2 more years of unemployment.”
I almost snorted my iced tea.
Heh.
-
When is the Obama admin. going to stop wasting out taxpayer dollars on useless Global Warming projects, that have already been proven to be a hoax?
In Feb. 2009, NASA fired a Taurus XL rocket carrying a Global Warming satellite to monitor and record carbon dioxide. After the rocket blasted through the Earth’s atmosphere it fell short of it’s orbiting height and blasted back towards the sea, landing somewhere around Antarctica. The future mission for another Global Warming satellite, called Glory, was scrubbed from it’s Sept. 2009 mission. The head of NASA said that they would be completing a thorough investigation into the failure. That mission cost $280 million taxpayer dollars.
Early Friday morning NASA fired off another Taurus XL rocket, with another Global Warming satellite, named Glory, and from what I’ve read, it failed for almost the very same reason the first launch failed. This launch cost the American taxpayers $424 million dollars.
That’s $704 million dollars shot to hell, almost literally.
Read an interesting comment on this today- If Obama keeps pushing for this we will soon be able to walk from CA to Japan on the failed missions sitting in the ocean of Obamas policies, no waders necessary.
I appologize to any people here that may be a part of NASA, I am not blaming you.
-
A sucessful launch would provide data debunking AGW, so any such mission has an auto-FAIL built in.
-
That’s a good point EastBayLarry. It would provide data debunking AGW. That is unless Michael Mann and East Anglia Univ. are reading and manipulating the data.
-
That would be my guess. Or, the satellite’s software is already rigged to give them what they want.
-
-
-
-
Does anyone have any way of getting in touch with Hooah Mac? I’d love to see him here if he’s interested.
-
Me too!
-
-
Thanks for the Facebook button!!!!!
Or, maybe…you’re looking for me
You guys will like this one. Or at least I did.
endurance challenge…how long can you last?
43 seconds
Couldn’t get passed the title, so Zero.
Me too. I’ve had enough Charlie Sheen for a lifetime.
via @StevenFoley
I was eating lunch today with my 12 year old grandson when his mom asked him “What is tomorrow?”
He said “It’s President’s Day”
She asked “What does that mean?” …. I was waiting for something profound…
He said, “President’s Day is when Obama steps out of the White House and if he sees his shadow, we have 2 more years of unemployment.”
I almost snorted my iced tea.
Heh.
When is the Obama admin. going to stop wasting out taxpayer dollars on useless Global Warming projects, that have already been proven to be a hoax?
In Feb. 2009, NASA fired a Taurus XL rocket carrying a Global Warming satellite to monitor and record carbon dioxide. After the rocket blasted through the Earth’s atmosphere it fell short of it’s orbiting height and blasted back towards the sea, landing somewhere around Antarctica. The future mission for another Global Warming satellite, called Glory, was scrubbed from it’s Sept. 2009 mission. The head of NASA said that they would be completing a thorough investigation into the failure. That mission cost $280 million taxpayer dollars.
Early Friday morning NASA fired off another Taurus XL rocket, with another Global Warming satellite, named Glory, and from what I’ve read, it failed for almost the very same reason the first launch failed. This launch cost the American taxpayers $424 million dollars.
That’s $704 million dollars shot to hell, almost literally.
Read an interesting comment on this today- If Obama keeps pushing for this we will soon be able to walk from CA to Japan on the failed missions sitting in the ocean of Obamas policies, no waders necessary.
I appologize to any people here that may be a part of NASA, I am not blaming you.
A sucessful launch would provide data debunking AGW, so any such mission has an auto-FAIL built in.
That’s a good point EastBayLarry. It would provide data debunking AGW. That is unless Michael Mann and East Anglia Univ. are reading and manipulating the data.
That would be my guess. Or, the satellite’s software is already rigged to give them what they want.
Does anyone have any way of getting in touch with Hooah Mac? I’d love to see him here if he’s interested.
Me too!
Thanks for the Facebook button!!!!!